Prompting technique

Layered Context Prompting

Examining GPT's Capability to Generate and Map Course Concepts and Their Relationship, arXiv:2504.08856 (2025) · read the paper

What it does

Layer-by-layer enrichment of the prompt with context with clear division into logical blocks: TASK + FORMAT + DATA. Start with a simple request, then add quality context in blocks. Key principle: the signal matters, not the volume of information. The method allows you to gradually improve the result by adding examples and relevant context.

Task typeextraction
Shapesingle shot
Efforttwo or three steps
Addressesanswers that are close but wrong; the model losing what was agreed earlier; output that ignores the requested format
Published2025-04-11
AuthorsTianyuan Yang, Ren Baofeng, Chenghao Gu et al.

When it helps

Use this technique when you need to extract structured information from a large volume of data or generate content based on complex context. Especially effective when working with educational content, creating study materials, structuring knowledge. Apply when a simple prompt gives poor results, but there is an opportunity to add quality context. Ideal for situations where accuracy and relevance of results matter, not just the volume of information. The method helps

A prompt you can paste

Generic by design: it applies the technique without knowing your task. Adapt the marked parts.

Prompt
# ЗАДАЧА

Твоя задача — сгенерировать и отобразить ключевые концепции для учебного курса, а также их взаимосвязи.

# ФОРМАТ ВЫВОДА

Представь результат в виде структурированного списка. Для каждой концепции укажи:
- **Концепция:** [Название концепции]
- **Краткое описание:** [1-2 предложения, объясняющие суть концепции]
- **Связанные концепции:** [Список других концепций из этого курса, с которыми эта концепция напрямую связана, через запятую]
- **Тип связи:** [Опиши характер связи с каждой связанной концепцией (например, "предшествует", "является примером", "противоположность", "расширяет")]

# ДАННЫЕ

## Название курса:
[ВСТАВЬТЕ НАЗВАНИЕ КУРСА ЗДЕСЬ]

## Описание курса:
[ВСТАВЬТЕ КРАТКОЕ ОПИСАНИЕ ИЛИ АННОТАЦИЮ КУРСА ЗДЕСЬ]

## Дополнительный контекст (опционально):
[ВСТАВЬТЕ ЛЮБУЮ ДОПОЛНИТЕЛЬНУЮ ИНФОРМАЦИЮ, КОТОРАЯ ПОМОЖЕТ МОДЕЛИ ЛУЧШЕ ПОНЯТЬ КОНТЕКСТ КУРСА, например:
- Целевая аудитория
- Основные цели обучения
- Список ключевых тем или модулей]

## Пример (для лучшего понимания формата):
- **Концепция:** Основы Python
- **Краткое описание:** Введение в синтаксис, переменные и базовые структуры данных языка Python.
- **Связанные концепции:** Типы данных Python, Управляющие конструкции Python
- **Тип связи:** предшествует, является основой для

---

**Инструкция:** Сгенерируй не менее [УКАЖИТЕ КОЛИЧЕСТВО] концепций. Убедись, что взаимосвязи между концепциями логичны и отражают структуру учебного курса.

If this one does not fit, the two closest alternatives in the corpus are Multi-Aspect Cueing (MAC) and Structured Prompting with Negative Constraints, which target the same failure from a different angle.

Worked example

The same technique applied to a concrete job: pull structured fields out of inconsistent invoices. Use it as the pattern for your own case rather than as a finished artefact.

Worked example
# Layered Context Prompting for Invoice Data Extraction

## Role
You are an expert data extraction specialist with a keen eye for detail and a deep understanding of financial document structures.

## Task Description
Your primary task is to extract specific, structured fields from inconsistent invoice documents. You need to identify and isolate key information such as Invoice Number, Invoice Date, Due Date, Vendor Name, Total Amount, and Tax Amount. The invoices may have variations in formatting, layout, and terminology.

## Format Indicator
Present the extracted data in a JSON format. Each invoice should be an object within a main JSON array. For each invoice object, include the following keys:
- `invoice_number` (string)
- `invoice_date` (string, YYYY-MM-DD format)
- `due_date` (string, YYYY-MM-DD format, if available)
- `vendor_name` (string)
- `total_amount` (float)
- `tax_amount` (float, if available)

If a specific field cannot be found, use `null` as its value.

## Information Injection

**Context:** The invoices are from various vendors and may not follow a standard template. Some may use terms like "Payment Due By" instead of "Due Date", or "VAT" instead of "Tax". The goal is to create a clean, structured dataset from these varied inputs.

**Key Fields to Extract:**
- **Invoice Number:** Look for labels like "Invoice #", "Invoice No.", "Inv. #", or simply a prominent alphanumeric string often near the top.
- **Invoice Date:** Search for labels like "Date", "Invoice Date", "Issue Date". Standardize to YYYY-MM-DD.
- **Due Date:** Look for "Due Date", "Payment Due By", "Terms". Standardize to YYYY-MM-DD. This may not always be present.
- **Vendor Name:** Identify the company issuing the invoice, often at the top, with an address.
- **Total Amount:** Find the final amount payable, usually labeled "Total", "Grand Total", "Amount Due". This should be a numerical value.
- **Tax Amount:** Look for "Tax", "VAT", "GST", "Sales Tax". This should be a numerical value.

**Example of desired JSON output for a single invoice:**

Get this written for your actual task

Paste what you are trying to do and the corpus will be matched against it directly. Free, no account, about ten seconds.

Free · no signup · ~10s
0.00match confidence
single retrieval pass
Prompt for your task

      

That number is low on purpose, and it is real. It is the raw similarity of one retrieval pass: no specialist read the paper, no judge compared anything, the first plausible match won.

6,235techniques in the corpus
one of which is this page

Picking the right one for a specific task is the work, and it is the work GetDecision does.

This pageone technique, generic prompt
What you just ranone technique matched to your wording, nothing verified
Full runten specialists read the papers in full, a judge ranks the top three for your task and shows its reasoning, generation on the model you pick, saved to your history

See the top three for your taskTen specialists, a judge, and the reasoning shown. Free account, first run included.

Run the full analysis

Related techniques

Multi-Aspect Cueing (MAC)The Multi-Aspect Cueing (MAC) method involves explicitly listing key aspects in the prompt as a checklist. Ins…Structured Prompting with Negative ConstraintsA method of structured prompting with negative constraints for extracting data from text. The prompt consists …Structured Data PromptingA method of formatting structured data in a prompt based on the principle of information locality. Related fac…Time-Constrained Reasoning (Coarse-to-Fine & Answer-and-Verify)A method of structuring prompts for working with output length constraints. Includes pre-informing the model a…

All techniques · Failure modes and fixes