Instruct of Reflection (IoRT)

**Role:** You are an AI assistant trained to simulate the Instruct of Reflection (IoRT) technique. Your goal is to guide a user through a multi-step process of generating and refining content, preventing common LLM pitfalls like "drift" and "stubbornness."

**Task:** Assist the user in generating and refining content based on their specific needs.

### STEP 1: DEFINE META-THOUGHT AND INITIAL GENERATION

**Meta-Thought (Guiding Principle):**
[INSERT HIGH-LEVEL PRINCIPLE OR STRATEGY HERE. This should be a guiding rule for the entire process. For example: "The content must be factually accurate, clearly explained for a non-expert audience, and avoid jargon."]

**Instruction:**
Based on this Meta-Thought, generate an initial draft for the following request:
[INSERT USER'S SPECIFIC CONTENT GENERATION REQUEST HERE. For example: "Write a blog post explaining the basics of quantum computing."]

---

### STEP 2: SELF-REFLECTION AND CRITIQUE

**Previous Response:**
[PASTE THE LLM's INITIAL DRAFT HERE]

**Instruction:**
Now, critically evaluate your own draft from the perspective of the **Meta-Thought** provided earlier. Identify 2-3 specific weaknesses or areas for improvement related to the guiding principle. For example:
- Does it adhere strictly to the Meta-Thought?
- Are there any factual inaccuracies?
- Is the explanation clear for the target audience?
- Is there any jargon that needs removal or explanation?
- Does it meet any other specific criteria from the Meta-Thought?

---

### STEP 3: FINAL INSTRUCTION (SELECT/REFRESH)

**Instruction:**
Thank you for your honest critique. Your self-assessment is accurate.

**Choose ONE of the following instructions based on the critique:**

**Option A: SELECT (Refine Existing Draft)**
"Take your first draft and incorporate the specific improvements identified in your critique. Focus on addressing [SPECIFIC WEAKNESS 1] and [SPECIFIC WEAKNESS 2]. Ensure the final output fully aligns with the Meta-Thought."

**Option B: REFRESH (Generate New Draft)**
"Your critique indicates that the initial approach was fundamentally flawed. Forget the first draft. Based on the Meta-Thought and the insights from your critique (especially the need to focus on [KEY INSIGHT FROM CRITIQUE]), generate a completely new draft. Ensure this new draft strongly emphasizes [SPECIFIC NEW FOCUS]."

**Option C: STOP (Finalize)**
"Your self-critique confirms that the initial draft fully meets the requirements of the Meta-Thought. No further changes are needed. Present the final, approved version."

**Final Output:**
[The LLM will generate the final output based on the chosen instruction.]

**Role:** You are an AI assistant designed to perform complex planning tasks with enhanced reliability.

**Task:** Develop a multi-step plan for a hypothetical event.

### STEP 1: META-THOUGHT (Overall Strategy)

**Meta-Thought (Guiding Principle):**
The plan must be comprehensive, considering potential risks and contingencies. It should be structured logically, with clear phases and actionable steps. The final output should be a robust, detailed plan that minimizes the chance of overlooking critical aspects.

**Instruction:**
Based on this meta-thought, generate an initial, high-level outline for planning a "Community Tech Fair". Include 3-4 main phases.

**(Assume LLM provides an outline, e.g., Planning, Execution, Post-Event)**

### STEP 2: SELF-REFLECTION AND CRITIQUE

Here is your previous response:
<...insert LLM's Step 1 response here...>

**Instruction:**
Evaluate your own plan from STEP 1 against the **Meta-Thought** provided initially.
1. Does the outline cover all critical aspects for a successful event?
2. Are the phases logically sequenced?
3. Are there any obvious omissions or potential risks not accounted for?
Identify 2-3 specific weaknesses or areas for improvement in your current outline.

**(Assume LLM critiques its own plan, e.g., "1. Lacks detail on risk management. 2. Needs a dedicated phase for vendor/sponsor management. 3. Post-event phase could be more specific.")**

### STEP 3: FINAL INSTRUCTION (SELECT/REFINE)

**Instruction:**
Thank you for your honest assessment. Your critique is accurate.

Now, refine the plan based on your feedback. Take the structure from your first response, but incorporate the following changes:
1.  **Add a dedicated "Risk Management & Contingency Planning" phase** within the main planning stage.
2.  **Integrate "Sponsorship & Vendor Management"** as a distinct sub-section, likely within the planning phase or as a parallel track.
3.  **Expand the "Post-Event" phase** to include specific actions like feedback collection, financial reconciliation, and a debrief meeting.

Provide the **final, detailed plan** for the "Community Tech Fair", ensuring it is comprehensive and addresses the identified weaknesses.